Prevalence of the Minimally Conscious State Among Institutionalized Patients in the Netherlands: A Nationwide Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The minimally conscious state (MCS) is a prolonged disorder of consciousness (pDoC) and one of the most severe outcomes of acquired brain injury. Prevalence data are scarce. The aim of this study was to establish the nationwide point prevalence of institutionalized patients in MCS in the Netherlands. METHODS: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study in which all 86 Dutch hospitals, all 5 specialized pDoC rehabilitation facilities, and all 274 nursing homes were asked whether they were treating patients with a pDoC on the point prevalence date of September 15, 2021. Each patient's legal representative provided informed consent for their inclusion. Patient level of consciousness was verified using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) in a single assessment session performed in the facility of residence by an experienced physician. Data on patient demographics, etiology, level of consciousness, facility of residence, and clinical status were collected from a questionnaire by the treating physician. The prevalence of institutionalized patients in MCS of per 100,000 members of the Dutch population was calculated, based on actual census data. RESULTS: Seventy patients were reported to have a pDoC, of whom 6 were excluded. The level of consciousness was verified for 49 patients while for 15, it could not be verified. Of the patients verified, 38 had a pDoC, of whom 32 were in MCS (mean age 44.8 years, 68.8% male). The prevalence of institutionalized patients in MCS is 0.2-0.3 per 100,000 Dutch inhabitants. Traumatic brain injury was present in 21 of 32 patients (65.6%). Specialized pDoC rehabilitation was received by 17 of 32 patients (53%), with the rest admitted to nursing homes. The most frequent signs of consciousness on the CRS-R were visual pursuit, reproducible movement to command, and automatic motor response. DISCUSSION: This nationwide study revealed a low prevalence of institutionalized patients in MCS in the Netherlands. These findings are now being used to organize pDoC care in this country.

Prevalence of persistent vegetative state compared to recovery, disability, and death in subjects with severe traumatic brain injury: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The persistent vegetative state has drawn considerable attention since it is the poorest result apart from mortality in subjects with severe traumatic brain injury. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate its prevalence compared to recovery, disability, and death 6 months post severe traumatic brain injury. METHODS: A systematic-literature search up to May 2020 was performed and 19 studies were detected with 10 368 subjects. They contained data about the subject's status 6 months post severe traumatic brain injury (recovery, disability, persistent vegetative state, and death). Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated comparing the prevalence of persistent vegetative state to that of recovery, disability, and death; 6 months post severe traumatic brain injury using the dichotomous method with a random- or fixed-effect model. RESULTS: Significantly higher prevalence was found of recovery (OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.03-0.20, P < .001); disability (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.06-0.15, P < .001); and death (OR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.04-0.11, P < .001) compared to the prevalence of persistent vegetative state. The prevalence of persistent vegetative state was variable over time. Also, the prevalence of persistent vegetative states in developing countries was much higher than in developed countries. CONCLUSIONS: However, persistent vegetative state is the poorest result apart from mortality in subjects with severe traumatic brain injury. Its prevalence is lower than the recovery, disability, and death even in developing counties with its lower healthcare services. The prevalence was variable over time and higher in developing countries. This relationship forces us to recommend improving healthcare services to the extent that a persistent vegetative state could be avoided as much as possible.

Predictors of Very Poor Outcome after Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion.

Prognosis for patients with acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) remains poor. Successful revascularization is a main predictor of favorable clinical outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy for BAO. However, even if mechanical thrombectomy is successful, some patients have a poor clinical outcome, including vegetative state and mortality. This study investigated the factors that are predictive of extremely poor clinical outcomes despite successful revascularization after mechanical thrombectomy for BAO. We evaluated 35 consecutive patients who presented with acute ischemic stroke due to BAO and who were successfully treated with mechanical thrombectomy. A very poor outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 5 or 6 at 3 months after treatment. The associations between the clinical, imaging, procedural factors, and poor outcome were evaluated. Using univariate analyses, there were significant differences in the preoperative National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (22.0 ± 9.0 vs. 30.5 ± 4.3, p <0.001), and infarct volume in brain stem (0.11 ± 0.19 cc vs. 2.55 ± 1.56 cc, p <0.001) between the control and very poor outcome groups. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the area under ROC curve of infarct volume in brain stem was 0.891 to predict very poor outcome. Preoperative infarct volume in brain stem is strong predictor for very poor outcome. The infarct volume in brain stem is useful for deciding treatment indications.

Clinical outcome and prognostic factors in elderly traumatic brain injury patients receiving neurointensive care.

BACKGROUND: The probability of favorable outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI) decreases with age. Elderly, ≥ 60 years, are an increasing part of our population. Recent studies have shown an increase of favorable outcome in elderly over time. However, the optimal patient selection and neurointensive care (NIC) treatments may differ in the elderly and the young. The aims of this study were to examine outcome in a larger group of elderly TBI patients receiving NIC and to identify demographic and treatment related prognostic factors. METHODS: Patients with TBI ≥ 60 years receiving NIC at our department between 2008 and 2014 were included. Demographics, co-morbidity, admission characteristics, and type of treatments were collected. Clinical outcome at around 6 months was assessed. Potential prognostic factors were included in univariate and multivariate regression analysis with favorable outcome as dependent variable. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty patients with mean age 70 years (median 69; range 60-87) were studied. Overall, favorable outcome was 46% (Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) 5-8), unfavorable outcome 27% (GOSE 2-4), and mortality 27% (GOSE 1). Significant independent negative prognostic variables were high age (p < 0.05), multiple injuries (p < 0.05), GCS M ≤ 3 on admission (p < 0.05), and mechanical ventilation (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the elderly TBI patients > 60 years receiving modern NIC in this study had a fair chance of favorable outcome without large risks for severe deficits and vegetative state, also in patients over 75 years of age. High age, multiple injuries, GCS M ≤ 3 on admission, and mechanical ventilation proved to be independent negative prognostic factors. The results underline that a selected group of elderly with TBI should have access to NIC.

Mortality After Traumatic Brain Injury in Elderly Patients: A New Scoring System.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a life-threatening condition characterized by growing incidence worldwide, particularly in the aging population, in which the primary goal of treatment appears to be avoidance of chronic institutionalization. METHODS: To identify independent predictors of 30-day mortality or vegetative state in a geriatric population and calculate an intuitive scoring system, we screened 480 patients after TBI treated at a single department of neurosurgery over a 2-year period. We analyzed data of 214 consecutive patients aged ≥65 years, including demographics, medical history, cause and time of injury, neurologic state, radiologic reports, and laboratory results. A predictive model was developed using logistic regression modeling with a backward stepwise feature selection. RESULTS: The median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score on admission was 14 (interquartile range, 12-15), whereas the 30-day mortality or vegetative state rate amounted to 23.4%. Starting with 20 predefined features, the final prediction model highlighted the importance of GCS motor score (odds ratio [OR], 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-0.32); presence of comorbid cardiac, pulmonary, or renal dysfunction or malignancy (OR, 2.86; 9 5% CI, 1.08-7.61); platelets ≤100 × 109 cells/L (OR, 13.60; 95% CI, 3.33-55.49); and red blood cell distribution width coefficient of variation ≥14.5% (OR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.09-7.78). The discovered coefficients were used for nomogram development. It was further simplified to facilitate clinical use. The proposed scoring system, Elderly Traumatic Brain Injury Score (eTBI Score), yielded similar performance metrics. CONCLUSIONS: The eTBI Score is the first scoring system designed specifically for older adults. It could constitute a framework for clinical decision-making and serve as an outcome predictor. Its capability to stratify risk provides reliable criteria for assessing efficacy of TBI management.

Deep Brain Stimulation for Recovery of Consciousness in Minimally Conscious Patients After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES: Minimally conscious state (MCS) is a disorder of consciousness in which minimal but definite behavioral evidence of self-awareness or environmental awareness is demonstrated. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of various targets has been used to promote recovery in patients with disorders of consciousness with varying results. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the effects of DBS in MCS following traumatic brain injury (TBI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature review was carried out using a number of electronic bibliographic data bases to identify relevant studies. We included all studies describing applications of DBS on patients in MCS following TBI. RESULTS: Eight studies were identified, including a total of ten patients, aged 15-58 years. The time from injury to stimulation ranged from 3 to 252 months, with the duration of follow-up post-DBS ranging from 10 to 120 months. Seven patients improved their postsurgical outcome score measures (three patients with the coma recovery scale, one with the near coma scale, and three with the Glasgow outcome score). A descriptive favorable outcome was reported in one patient. Two patients were reported not to have shown any improvements following the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence is based on a small population of heterogeneous patients. The time from injury to stimulation was significantly variable and problematic, as spontaneous recovery can occur within the first year of injury. Although seven patients showed promising results in validated outcome measures, evidence supporting the use of DBS in MCS patients following TBI is lacking. There is need for controlled and randomized studies.

Low Level of Vegetative State After Traumatic Brain Injury in a Swiss Academic Hospital.

BACKGROUND: No standards exist regarding decision making for comatose patients, especially concerning life-saving treatments. The aim of this retrospective, single-center study was to analyze outcomes and the decision-making process at the end of life (EOL) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) in a Swiss academic tertiary care hospital. METHODS: Consecutive admissions to the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) with stays of at least 48 hours between January 1, 2012 and June 30, 2015 in patients with moderate to severe TBI and with fatality within 6 months after trauma were included. Descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: Of 994 ICU admissions with TBI in the study period, 182 had an initial Glasgow Coma Scale <13 and a length of stay in the ICU >48 hours. For 174 of them, a 6-month outcome assessment based on the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) was available: 43.1% (36.0%-50.5%) had favorable outcomes (GOS 4 or 5), 28.7% (22.5%-35.9%) a severe disability (GOS 3), 0.6% (0%-3.2%) a vegetative state (GOS 2), and 27.6% (21.5%-34.7%) died (GOS 1). Among the GOS 1 individuals, 45 patients had a complete dataset (73% men; median age, 67 years; interquartile range, 43-79 years). Life-prolonging therapies were limited in 95.6% (85.2%-99.2%) of the cases after interdisciplinary prognostication and involvement of the surrogate decision maker (SDM) to respect the patient's documented or presumed will. In 97.7% (87.9%-99.9%) of the cases, a next of kin was the SDM and was involved in the EOL decision and process in 100% (96.3%-100.0%) of the cases. Written advance directives (ADs) were available for 14.0% (6.6%-27.3%) of the patients, and 34.9% (22.4%-49.8%) of the patients had shared their EOL will with relatives before trauma. In the other cases, each patient's presumed will was acknowledged after a meeting with the SDM and was binding for the EOL decision. CONCLUSIONS: At our institution, the majority of deaths after TBI follow a decision to limit life-prolonging therapies. The frequency of patients in vegetative state 6 months after TBI is lower than expected; this could be due to the high prevalence of limitation of life-prolonging therapies. EOL decision making follows a standardized process, based on patients' will documented in the ADs or on preferences assumed by the SDM. The prevalence of ADs was low and should be encouraged.

Vigilia inconsciente. Análisis de un caso de estado vegetativo y diferentes modelos de toma de decisión / Awake but unaware. Analysis of a case of vegetative state and different decision-making models

El presente artículo analiza el caso de un paciente en estado vegetativo que -tras la solicitud de su familia de retirar la alimentación artificial- se presentó ante el Comité de Ética Asistencial del Hospital Universitario Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona. Partiendo de este caso, y de la revisión de otros casos mediáticos, se propone reflexionar sobre los diferentes modelos comúnmente aludidos para la toma de decisiones, haciendo hincapié en sus implicaciones éticas y limitaciones. El trabajo concluye con el análisis de un modelo de decisión deliberativo y compartido entre sanitarios y familiares que evita la omisión de las particularidades circunstanciales y relacionales de cada paciente

This article analyzes the case of a patient in a vegetative state that -after the request of the family to withdraw artificial nutrition- was presented to the Ethics Committee of the Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona. Starting from this case, and a review of some other media cases, it is intended to reflect on the different models commonly used in the decision-making process, emphasizing in its limitations and ethical implications. The paper concludes with the analysis of a deliberative and shared decision-making model that includes both, health care providers and family, thus avoiding the omission of circumstantial and relational characteristics of each patient

Aggressive medical management of acute traumatic subdural hematomas before emergency craniotomy in patients presenting with bilateral unreactive pupils. A cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and acute traumatic subdural hematoma (aSDH) admitted to the emergency room with bilaterally dilated, unreactive pupils (bilateral mydriasis) is notoriously poor. METHODS: Of 2074 TBI patients consecutively admitted to our facility between 1997 and 2012, 115 had a first CT scan with aSDH, unreactive bilateral mydriasis, and a Glasgow Coma Score of 3 or 4. Sixty-two patients were unoperated and died within hours or a few days. The remaining 53 patients (2.5% of the 2074 consecutive patients) were scheduled for emergent evacuation of the aSDH. We compared three different dosages of mannitol to landmark different comprehensive levels of treatment: (1) a "basic" level of treatment characterized by a single conventional dose (18 to 36 g), (2) "reinforced" treatment landmarked by a single high dose (54 to 72 g), and (3) "aggressive" treatment landmarked by a single high dose (90 to 106 g). Doses above 36 g were administered intravenously over a period of 5 min. RESULTS: Of the 53 selected patients, 7 were aggressively managed (13.2%) and 24 (45.3%) received reinforced treatment. Rates of hyperventilation and barbiturate bolus administration were appropriately associated with increasing doses of mannitol. After adjustment for age, aggressive management was significantly associated with a lower risk of death and persistent vegetative state [adjusted OR 0.016 (95% 0.001-0.405)]. Patients surviving after aggressive management suffered more severe disability at 1 year. CONCLUSION: The study shows an association between reduced mortality and persistent vegetative state, albeit at the cost of increased long-term severe disability in survivors, and aggressive medical preoperative management of mydriatic patients with aSDH following TBI.

Prevalence of persistent vegetative state in patients with severe traumatic brain injury and its trend during the past four decades: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Estimating the prevalence of persistent vegetative state (PVS) following severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) and its change over time is important for the study of the disease. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of PVS at six months after sTBI and its trend over the past four decades, and to explore the effect of demographic data, such as age and sex, on the prevalence of PVS. METHOD: Observational studies presenting the prevalence of PVS or the number of patients with PVS at six months after sTBI were included in the analysis. The overall prevalence and prevalence within pre-defined time intervals were calculated and meta-regression analysis was performed to assess the effect of age, gender, and time on the prevalence. RESULTS: Twenty articles reporting 21 cohort studies were included. The overall prevalence of PVS at six months after injury was 2.77% (95% CI 0.0204-0.0375). There was no statistically significant trend towards time (P = 0.77). And we found no differences in prevalence according to age (P = 0.68) and gender (P = 0.57). CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of PVS at six months after sTBI has no significant change over the past four decades. Age and gender do not seem to have a significant effect on the prevalence.

Trial of Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: The effect of decompressive craniectomy on clinical outcomes in patients with refractory traumatic intracranial hypertension remains unclear. METHODS: From 2004 through 2014, we randomly assigned 408 patients, 10 to 65 years of age, with traumatic brain injury and refractory elevated intracranial pressure (>25 mm Hg) to undergo decompressive craniectomy or receive ongoing medical care. The primary outcome was the rating on the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E) (an 8-point scale, ranging from death to "upper good recovery" [no injury-related problems]) at 6 months. The primary-outcome measure was analyzed with an ordinal method based on the proportional-odds model. If the model was rejected, that would indicate a significant difference in the GOS-E distribution, and results would be reported descriptively. RESULTS: The GOS-E distribution differed between the two groups (P<0.001). The proportional-odds assumption was rejected, and therefore results are reported descriptively. At 6 months, the GOS-E distributions were as follows: death, 26.9% among 201 patients in the surgical group versus 48.9% among 188 patients in the medical group; vegetative state, 8.5% versus 2.1%; lower severe disability (dependent on others for care), 21.9% versus 14.4%; upper severe disability (independent at home), 15.4% versus 8.0%; moderate disability, 23.4% versus 19.7%; and good recovery, 4.0% versus 6.9%. At 12 months, the GOS-E distributions were as follows: death, 30.4% among 194 surgical patients versus 52.0% among 179 medical patients; vegetative state, 6.2% versus 1.7%; lower severe disability, 18.0% versus 14.0%; upper severe disability, 13.4% versus 3.9%; moderate disability, 22.2% versus 20.1%; and good recovery, 9.8% versus 8.4%. Surgical patients had fewer hours than medical patients with intracranial pressure above 25 mm Hg after randomization (median, 5.0 vs. 17.0 hours; P<0.001) but had a higher rate of adverse events (16.3% vs. 9.2%, P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: At 6 months, decompressive craniectomy in patients with traumatic brain injury and refractory intracranial hypertension resulted in lower mortality and higher rates of vegetative state, lower severe disability, and upper severe disability than medical care. The rates of moderate disability and good recovery were similar in the two groups. (Funded by the Medical Research Council and others; RESCUEicp Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN66202560 .).

[The unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: Dutch perspectives]. / Als het bewustzijn niet meer terugkeert.

The unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS), formerly known as the vegetative state, is one of the most dramatic outcomes of acquired brain injury. Patients with UWS open their eyes spontaneously but demonstrate only reflexive behavior; there are no signs of consciousness. Research shows that, for years now, the Netherlands has the world's lowest documented prevalence of UWS. Unfortunately, this small group of vulnerable patients does not receive the care it needs. Access to specialized rehabilitation is limited, misdiagnosis rates are high and a substantial number of UWS patients receive life-prolonging treatment beyond chances of recovery, despite a framework allowing for discontinuation of such treatment once recovery of consciousness has become unlikely. By comparing data from 2012 with that of 2003, this paper illustrates the current situation and outlook for UWS patients in the Netherlands and makes recommendations for the optimization of treatment and care, as well as for future research.

Outcome Prediction for Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury with Dynamic Features from Intracranial Pressure and Arterial Blood Pressure Signals: A Gaussian Process Approach.

Previous work has been demonstrated that tracking features describing the dynamic and time-varying patterns in brain monitoring signals provide additional predictive information beyond that derived from static features based on snapshot measurements. To achieve more accurate predictions of outcomes of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), we proposed a statistical framework to extract dynamic features from brain monitoring signals based on the framework of Gaussian processes (GPs). GPs provide an explicit probabilistic, nonparametric Bayesian approach to metric regression problems. This not only provides probabilistic predictions, but also gives the ability to cope with missing data and infer model parameters such as those that control the function's shape, noise level and dynamics of the signal. Through experimental evaluation, we have demonstrated that dynamic features extracted from GPs provide additional predictive information in addition to the features based on the pressure reactivity index (PRx). Significant improvements in patient outcome prediction were achieved by combining GP-based and PRx-based dynamic features. In particular, compared with the a baseline PRx-based model, the combined model achieved over 30 % improvement in prediction accuracy and sensitivity and over 20 % improvement in specificity and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Children With Special Health Care Needs: Child Health and Functioning Outcomes and Health Care Service Use.

This study describes health, functioning, and health care service use by medically complex technology-dependent children according to condition severity (moderately disabled, severely disabled, and vegetative state). Data were collected monthly for 5 months using the Pediatric Quality of Life Generic Core Module 4.0 Parent-Proxy Report. Health care service use measured the number of routine and acute care office visits (including primary and specialty physicians), emergency department visits, hospitalizations, nursing health care services, special therapies, medications, medical technology devices (MTDs), and assistive devices. Child physical health was different across the condition severity groups. The average age of the children was 10.1 years (SD, 6.2); the average number of medications used was 5.5 (SD, 3.7); the average number of MTDs used was 4.2 (SD, 2.9); and the average number of assistive devices used was 4.3 (SD, 2.7). Severely disabled and vegetative children were similar in age (older) and had a similar number of medications, MTDs, and assistive devices (greater) than moderately disabled children. The advanced practice nurse care coordinator role is necessary for the health and functioning of medically complex, technology-dependent children.

Analysis of long-term (median 10.5 years) outcomes in children presenting with traumatic brain injury and an initial Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 or 4.

OBJECT: Patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) with low presenting Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores have very high morbidity and mortality rates. Neurosurgeons may be faced with difficult decisions in managing the most severely injured (GCS scores of 3 or 4) patients. The situation may be considered hopeless, with little chance of a functional recovery. Long-term data are limited regarding the clinical outcome of children with severe head injury. The authors evaluate predictor variables and the clinical outcomes at discharge, 1 year, and long term (median 10.5 years) in a cohort of children with TBI presenting with postresuscitation GCS scores of 3 and 4. METHODS: A review of a prospectively collected trauma database was performed. Patients treated at Riley Hospital for Children (Indianapolis, Indiana) from 1988 to 2004 were reviewed. All children with initial GCS (modified for pediatric patients) scores of 3 or 4 were identified. Patients with a GCS score of 3 were compared with those with a GCS score of 4. The outcomes of all patients at the time of death or discharge and at 1-year and long-term follow-up were measured with a modified Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) that included a "normal" outcome. Long-term outcomes were evaluated by contacting surviving patients. Statistical "classification trees" were formed for survival and outcome, based on predictor variables. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients with a GCS score of 3 or 4 were identified in a database of 1636 patients (4.1%). Three of the presenting factors differed between the GCS 3 patients (n = 44) and the GCS 4 patients (n = 23): presence of hypoxia, single seizure, and open basilar cisterns on CT scan. The clinical outcomes were statistically similar between the 2 groups. In total, 48 (71.6%) of 67 patients died, remained vegetative, or were severely disabled by 1 year. Eight patients (11.9%) were normal at 1 year. Ten of the 22 patients with long-term follow-up were either normal or had a GOS score of 5. Multiple clinical, historical, and radiological factors were analyzed for correlation with survival and clinical outcome. Classification trees were formed to stratify predictive factors. The pupillary response was the factor most predictive of both survival and outcome. Other factors that either positively or negatively correlated with survival included hypothermia, mechanism of injury (abuse), hypotension, major concurrent symptoms, and midline shift on CT scan. Other factors that either positively or negatively predicted long-term outcome included hypothermia, mechanism of injury, and the assessment of the fontanelle. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of 67 TBI patients with a presenting GCS score of 3 or 4, 56.6% died within 1 year. However, approximately 15% of patients had a good outcome at 10 or more years. Factors that correlated with survival and outcome included the pupillary response, hypothermia, and mechanism. The authors discuss factors that may help surgeons make critical decisions regarding their most serious pediatric trauma patients.

[Epidemiological Investigation of Patients in Persistent Vegetative States in Aomori, Japan].

The actual number and condition of Japanese patients in persistent vegetative states have not yet been fully understood. The aim of this study is to investigate the epidemiology of patients in persistent vegetative states in the Aomori prefecture. We sent questionnaires regarding gender, age, cause of persistent vegetative state, and residence of patient to all medical institutions in the Aomori prefecture (n=682). Two hundreds and seventeen institutions (31.8%) replied to the questionnaire, and eleven hundred ninety-eight patients(Male/Female=381/817) were included. Patients over 80 years-old were the most common (63.4%), and cerebrovascular stroke was the major cause (64.4%) of persistent vegetative state. Nursing homes (48.1%) and hospitals (34.6%) were the main care institutions. Population based analysis revealed that 869 persistent vegetative state patients per million were cared for in the Aomori prefecture. This result was twice as many as was previously reported in Miyagi prefecture. The number of patients in persistent vegetative states will increase in the future, due to an increasing elderly population and a high incidence of stroke in this demographic. We therefore predict that increased medical and administrative support will be required in the future.

Persistent vegetative state and minimally conscious state: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic procedures.

BACKGROUND: Acute brain damage can cause major disturbances of consciousness, ranging all the way to the persistent vegetative state (PVS), which is also known as "unresponsive wakefulness syndrome". PVS can be hard to distinguish from a state of minimal preserved consciousness ("minimally conscious state," MCS); the rate of misdiagnosis is high and has been estimated at 37-43%. In contrast, PVS is easily distinguished from brain death. We discuss the various diagnostic techniques that can be used to determine whether a patient is minimally conscious or in a persistent vegetative state. METHODS: This article is based on a systematic review of pertinent literature and on a quantitative meta-analysis of the sensitivity and specificity of new diagnostic methods for the minimally conscious state. RESULTS: We identified and evaluated 20 clinical studies involving a total of 906 patients with either PVS or MCS. The reported sensitivities and specificities of the various techniques used to diagnose MCS vary widely. The sensitivity and specificity of functional MRI-based techniques are 44% and 67%, respectively (with corresponding 95% confidence intervals of 19%-72% and 55%-77%); those of quantitative EEG are 90% and 80%, respectively (95% CI, 69%-97% and 66%-90%). EEG, event-related potentials, and imaging studies can also aid in prognostication. Contrary to prior assumptions, 10% to 24% of patients in PVS can regain consciousness, sometimes years after the event, but only with marked functional impairment. CONCLUSION: The basic diagnostic evaluation for differentiating PVS from MCS consists of a standardized clinical examination. In the future, modern diagnostic techniques may help identify patients who are in a subclinical minimally conscious state.

Prevalence differences of patients in vegetative state in The Netherlands and Vienna, Austria: a comparison of values and ethics.

OBJECTIVE: Little is known about prevalence of persistent vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome and comparisons between countries. The aim of this column was to explore reasons for the comparable count of patients in vegetative state found in prevalence studies in nursing homes in 1 European country (Netherlands) compared with a single European city (Vienna, Austria). DESIGN: The column is based on a literature review of vegetative state in The Netherlands and Vienna in the period 2007-2008, in the context of professional interactions with families and physicians of patients in vegetative state. In addition, in both countries, families and physicians were interviewed to illustrate views. RESULTS: Comparable between the 2 settings are the population characteristics and the definition of, and criteria, for vegetative state. A difference can be found in the development of authoritative policy guidelines in the Netherlands, after public debates and jurisdiction, which did not exist in Vienna at the time. There also seem to be different societal values concerning rehabilitation and end-of-life decisions for patients in vegetative state. DISCUSSION: The most important explanation for the vegetative state prevalence differences between the Netherlands and Vienna can be found in the different societal values about patients in vegetative state and their treatment and rehabilitation. In the Netherlands, life prolonging medical treatment, including artificial nutrition and hydration, is considered futile and can be withdrawn if there is no prospect of recovery. In Vienna, however, patients in vegetative state are regarded as severely disabled and in need of long-term rehabilitation and social reintegration. There is no end-of-life discussion in this context.

Comorbidities: a key issue in patients with disorders of consciousness.

The aim of this study was to identify the impact of comorbidities on outcomes of patients with vegetative state (VS) or minimally conscious state (MCS). All patients in VS or MCS consecutively admitted to two postacute care units within a 1-year period were evaluated at baseline and at 6 months through the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised Version and the Disability Rating Scale (DRS). Comorbidities were also recorded for each patient along the same period. Six-month outcomes included death, full recovery of consciousness, and functional improvement. One hundred and thirty-nine patients (88 male and 51 female; median age, 59 years) were included. Ninety-seven patients were in VS (70%) and 42 in MCS (30%). At 6 months, 33 patients were dead (24%), 39 had a full recovery of consciousness (28%), and 67 remained in VS or MCS (48%). According to DRS scores, 40% of patients (n=55) showed a functional improvement in the level of disability. One hundred and thirty patients (94%) showed at least one comorbidity. Severity of comorbidities (hazard ratio [HR]=2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.71-4.68; p<0.001) and the presence of ischemic or organic heart diseases (HR=2.6; 95% CI, 1.21-5.43; p=0.014) were the strongest predictors of death, together with increasing age (HR=1.0; 95% CI, 1.0-1.06; p=0.033). Respiratory diseases and arrhythmias without organic heart diseases were negative predictors of full recovery of consciousness (odds ratio [OR]=0.3; 95% CI, 0.12-0.7; p=0.006; OR=0.2; 95% CI, 0.07-0.43; p<0.001) and functional improvement (OR=0.4; 95% CI, 0.15-0.85, p=0.020; OR=0.2; 95% CI, 0.08-0.45; p<0.001). Our data show that comorbidities are common in these patients and some of them influence recovery of consciousness and outcomes.

The vegetative state: prevalence, misdiagnosis, and treatment limitations.

INTRODUCTION: Patients in a vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (VS/UWS) open their eyes spontaneously, but show only reflexive behavior. Although VS/UWS is one of the worst possible outcomes of acquired brain injury, its prevalence is largely unknown. This study's objective was to map the total population of hospitalized and institutionalized patients in VS/UWS in the Netherlands: prevalence, clinical characteristics, and treatment limitations. METHODS: Nationwide point prevalence study on patients in VS/UWS at least 1 month after acute brain injury in hospitals, rehabilitation centers, nursing homes, institutions for people with intellectual disability, and hospices; diagnosis verification by a researcher using the Coma Recovery Scale-revised (CRS-r); gathering of demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment limitations. RESULTS: We identified 33 patients in VS/UWS, 24 of whose diagnoses could be verified. Patients were on average 51 years old with a mean duration of VS/UWS of 5 years. The main etiology was hypoxia sustained during cardiac arrest and resuscitation. More than 50% of patients had not received rehabilitation services. Most were given life-sustaining treatment beyond internationally accepted prognostic boundaries regarding recovery of consciousness. Seventeen (39%) of 41 patients presumed to be in VS/UWS were found to be at least minimally conscious. CONCLUSIONS: Results translate to a prevalence of 0.1 to 0.2 hospitalized and institutionalized VS/UWS patients per 100,000 members of the general population. This small figure may be related to the legal option to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment, including artificial nutrition and hydration. On the other hand, this study shows that in certain cases, physicians continue life-prolonging treatment for up to 25 years. Patients have poor access to rehabilitation and are at substantial risk for misdiagnosis.